Microsoft says There is “Neverthing Unique” About Activision Games

Microsoft said it’s a “many unique” thing for New Zealand regulators — in their latest bid to get the pricey merger approved. Microsoft says that the gaming giant doesn’t produce any “must have” titles, and should be allowed to complete the acquisition.

The DAY-GOINGLY FAMILY SCHOOL.

This claim is part of Microsoft’s efforts to alleviate the fear that its Activision Blizzard merger threatens the gaming industry by creating problems with competition on the market. In doing that, Microsoft has said that its rivals would get just fine without Activision Blizzard titles, and could still compete in a “vibrant” gaming market.

Its relationship with Activision is that our contract does not have any morals or morals.

The majority of games are produced and published by other parties and not [Activision Blizzard] such as Sony, Nintendo, EA and Take-Two, according to the document, and addresses concerns about monopolisation of the industry.

“Specifically, in the case of Activision Blizzard video games, there’s nothing unique about them, such as the games developed and published by Activision Blizzard”, a statement continues. “There aren’t any “must have” for rivals of those makers who can create a foreclosure problem.”

This sounds like an increasingly harsh language from the tech giant who wants to buy a studio, but it is unlikely that it’s referring to Activision Blizzard as well. Rather, it seems that it should be a statement intended for regulators who may not understand the gaming market – and therefore make clear that Activision Blizzard doesn’t have a monopoly on that particular genre. But I don’t agree that this reading is funny.

The company’s goal is to ease worries that the merger would give them an unfair advantage in the sector.

Microsoft also claims the gaming industry has “low barriers to entry”, meaning that content will remain available for distribution to rival PC, console and mobile distributors.

It looks becoming increasingly likely that Microsoft will soon have the regulatory approval it needs to proceed with the merger. As we mentioned earlier, the agreement could get approval from the US regulators as soon as August, – could this possibly be weeks away. You’d better ask the regulatory authorities whether or not companies need further evidence. If not, the deal might go ahead.